Introduction
Section 1
Project Prevention was established in 1997 by Barbara Harris which aimed to sterilize drug addicts who have had several children in the past. These drug addicts do get a choice between a long term birth control i.e. sterilization or a short term birth control; this project would pay a set amount of cash to volunteering drug addicts. Formerly known as Children Requiring a Caring Kommunity or C.R.A.C.K is a charity and has been based in California (now North Carolina) – it is operating in the U.K. since 2010. Harris created this charity after she had adopted (with Husband) her fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth children from the hands of a drug addicted mother.
This ‘charity’ has had its fair share of controversies and is still handling them.
As a group we felt that Harris having children who had been affected by drug addicts is a main factor in her movement. Her experiences with dealing with drugs and how they not only affect the user but those around them caused her life to have a certain view. We thought what kind of human that is Barbara Harris could have the courage to question and address whether another being could have a child or not. In my opinion, she is wrong to judge and commit to these addicts’ choice but does have a valid point. The child is at high risk of getting any mutations through the parent’s use of drugs however if the parent does sterilize and perhaps get ‘clean’ of their addiction and also is interested in a child – what would happen? Harris has ruined her life due to her not having the ability to conceive.
There are many alternatives to this sort of organization; believing that support groups would be more beneficial than a movement which confines you to a life of drugs.
Our main center topic would be about Project Prevention but more importantly, the idea of eugenics. Whether we have the right to play god on someone who has no control.
Eugenics
The study of or belief in the possibility of improving thequalities of the human species or a human population,especially by such means as discouraging reproduction bypersons having genetic defects or presumed to haveinheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) orencouraging reproduction by persons presumed to haveinheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics).
- Hitler and his Jews – 1933 – 1939
- Sterilization Law in Indiana – 1907
- Protection Law in Japan which sterilized those who had illnesses – genetic screening was encouraged and contraception was restricted within certain communities – 1948
- Sexual Sterilization Act in Alberta Canada which featured patients with a mental illness, perverts, prostitutes, epileptics and alcoholics were forced to sterilize – 1928
We believed that the idea of eugenics caused people to discriminate, demean and dehumanize those who have ‘undesirable traits’. Our ideas revolving around the negative aspects of the science, we made clear that we had all agreed that the control of such eugenics could never be given to one individual due to the likelihood of said person abusing the power. We explored genetic engineering or ‘designing a baby’ and how it would cause people to be more openly racist or sexist.
We took note of the practical implications of eugenics such as reducing the immunity from certain viruses and bacteria because the population would be developed from a few gene pools. This would cause an epidemic of being more likely and also put entire races in danger. New forms of contraception would also have to be developed to prevent the ‘wrong’ people to have children which caused us to expand and ask ‘what if these ‘bad’ people did have children?’ Is there a suitable and logical way to punish them? These thoughts ended up causing us to think of what we would do in a position of power or even a position of a god.
The thought of eugenics in the modern era seems to be scarce – we had compared this to computer games such as ‘the Sims’ or ‘Animal Crossing’ which gave the user the ability to design and control their own beings and be able to achieve anything within these games. Furthermore, due to these games being evidently so popular amongst the youth and growing up – the future generation would be desensitized to the point that is ‘all humans are human and are equal’. Relating back to Project Prevention, in the eyes of Barbara Harris; can this social code be seen?
Eugenics has mixed opinions – it can produce positives and negatives; negatives being that no man nor woman should have the ability to play god and the positives which is that world would be a happier and healthier community in the eyes of many. This then can lead to those ‘many’ abusing the power and cause the inventible which is the opposite of a happier and healthier community – corrupt.
Thinking of eugenics we wanted to focus on many aspects of it – creating various scripts revolving around it such as racism, sexism etc. Instead of focusing on power, we wanted to focus on the effect on human lives of eugenics; thus, we looked into Barbara Harris’ organization and the effect it would have on a woman who had been sterilized but is now wanting a child. Our main question would be;
Do we all have the right to play God?



Recent Comments